When noncanonical olfaction is optimal.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41055999.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1073/pnas.2508439122 and PMC identifier 12541337.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The early olfactory system is canonically described by a "one-receptor-to-one-neuron" model: each olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) expresses a single type of olfactory receptor (OR). Although the olfactory systems of many model organisms approximately follow this canonical organization, a number of exceptions are known. In particular, Aedes aegypti mosquitoes coexpress multiple types of ORs in many OSNs. Why do some olfactory systems follow the canonical organization while others violate it? We approach this question from the normative perspective of efficient coding. We find that the canonical and noncanonical organizations optimally encode odor signals in different types of olfactory environment. Noncanonical olfaction is beneficial when relevant sources emit correlated odorants and the environment contains odorants from ethologically irrelevant odor sources. Our theory explains previous observations of receptor coexpression and provides a framework from which to understand the structure of early olfactory systems.
Medical subject headings
- Smell
- Olfactory Receptor Neurons
- Receptors, Odorant