Microfluidic investigation of CO<sub>2</sub> foam flow in a heterogeneous porous medium.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41070753.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1039/d5lc00544b.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
CO<sub>2</sub> foam has emerged as a promising alternative to CO<sub>2</sub> gas for mobility control in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications, yet the pore-scale dynamics and mechanisms governing foam flow and oil displacement in heterogeneous porous media remain relatively underexplored. This study investigates the pore-scale behavior of CO<sub>2</sub> foam flow and its efficacy for EOR in a microfluidic heterogeneous porous medium under ambient conditions. The microfluidic device, composed of parallel high- and low-permeable regions with a permeability ratio of 5.8, enabled direct visualization of foam generation, propagation, and oil displacement dynamics. A flow-focusing geometry was used to produce stable foam bubbles ranging from 30-270 μm, with size and texture governed by gas pressure and liquid flow rates. The foam morphology and transport characteristics were further analyzed as functions of the gas injection ratio (<i>R</i><sub>g</sub>), revealing that increasing <i>R</i><sub>g</sub> led to a higher gas areal fraction (<i>F</i><sub>g</sub>), increased gas trapping, and reduced foam velocity (<i>V̄</i><sub>f</sub>) and texture (<i>n</i><sub>f</sub>). Oil displacement experiments using SDS solution, CO<sub>2</sub> gas, and CO<sub>2</sub> foam showed distinct differences in performance. SDS solution and CO<sub>2</sub> foam formed relatively stable displacement fronts in the high-permeable zone, while CO<sub>2</sub> gas exhibited severe viscous fingering and early breakthrough. Foam flooding achieved significantly higher oil recovery (up to 100%) at faster rates compared to gas injection, owing to foam-induced pore blocking and vertical flow diversion into the low-permeable zone. These findings provide insights for optimizing foam-based EOR processes and highlight the value of microfluidics for resolving multiphase transport phenomena at the pore scale.