Body Mass Index as a Predictor of Surgical Outcomes in Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: A Nationwide Analysis.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41071281.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012514.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There is no universally agreed upon body mass index (BMI) cutoff for performing gender-affirming vaginoplasty. This study aims to identify the relationship between BMI and postoperative outcomes, if any, following vaginoplasty in adult transgender patients. A retrospective analysis was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) datasets from 2005-2022. Adult patients with an ICD-9/10 code diagnosis of gender dysphoria who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty were included. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of BMI on surgical outcomes. Among 11,574,114 patients in the database, 312 patients underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Patients among the higher obesity classes demonstrated higher rates of 30-day readmissions (p<0.001), 30-day reoperations (p<0.001), operating room takebacks (p<0.001), and wound dehiscence (p<0.001). Upon multivariable regression analysis, Obesity Class II and Class III diagnoses significantly increased patients' risk of 30-day readmissions (OR 33.6, p=0.008; OR 69.1, p=0.001), 30-day reoperations (OR 25.3, p=0.011; OR 61.4, p=0.001), and operating room takebacks (OR 25.3, p=0.011; OR 61.4, p=0.001). The risk of wound dehiscence was significantly higher for Obesity Class III patients (19.5, p=0.004), but not for Obesity Class II (OR 3.3, p=0.377). Patients with class III obesity have higher rates of dehiscence, reoperation, and readmission. Surgeons should consider these findings when discussing risks and expectations with patients during the informed consent process.