Mitomycin C in Non-endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial Involving 442 Cases.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41075858.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.10.005.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate whether 0.04% mitomycin C (MMC) application at the ostium enhances the outcome of non-endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (NEED) in individuals with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). Prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial. Consenting adults with PANDO were recruited for this multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial for superiority at 2 tertiary level eye care centers. Eligible participants scheduled to undergo NEED with intubation were randomized into the study (0.04% MMC application for 3 minutes) and control (no MMC) arms, and were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was structural patency by lacrimal irrigation at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures included sustained patency and complete relief from epiphora after NEED at 1 and 5 years. A total of 442 patients met the study criteria and were recruited. A large majority were female (314; 71%). Study and control arms were comparable in age (44.0 ± 13.4 vs 43.4 ± 13.6 years; P = .64), sex, socioeconomic status, and side of surgery. The mean follow-up time for the MMC and control groups was 35.7 ± 26.8 vs 36.5 ± 28.0 months (median, 33 vs 35 months), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for structural patency at 6 months was comparable between the MMC and control groups, with no statistically significant difference (log rank test, P = .74). Complete success in the MMC and control groups was 94.6% vs 95% at 1 year and 93% vs 94% at 5 years, respectively, showing excellent and comparable long-term outcomes. Granuloma at the ostium (4.5%) and prolapse of the tube (4.0%) were the most common complications and were comparable in both groups. This large double-blind, randomized clinical trial showed that MMC (0.04% for 3 minutes) application at the ostium did not enhance the outcome in NEED for adults with PANDO, and its routine use should be reconsidered in this setting.
Medical subject headings
- Dacryocystorhinostomy
- Mitomycin
- Nasolacrimal Duct
- Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
- Alkylating Agents