Auditory Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery: An Analysis of Middle Ear Disease.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41084348.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/ohn.70022 and PMC identifier 12661467.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To characterize postoperative Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and middle ear pathology following Le Fort I osteotomy. Retrospective cohort study. Single tertiary care center. Patients who underwent Le Fort I (LF1) osteotomy between 2000 and 2022 were identified using CPT codes. Audiometric, tympanometric, clinical, and surgical data were extracted. ETD was defined by abnormal tympanometry (type B or C), an air-bone gap >10 dB, or PE tube placement. Patients were stratified by preoperative ETD status and classified by postoperative phenotype. Among 2316 surgical patients, 151 had audiometric data. 47 patients met criteria for postoperative ETD: 15 had no prior history of ETD, 15 had a remote history of ETD, and 17 had active preoperative ETD within the year preceding Le Fort surgery. The most common phenotype of postoperative ETD was middle ear effusion (49%), followed by objective pressure abnormalities without effusion (17%), symptoms only (15%), cholesteatoma (11%), and complete Eustachian tube stenosis (9%). 28% of patients with postoperative ETD required PE tube placement and 13% required more advanced otologic surgery. Notably, 2 patients without a history of cleft palate or craniofacial syndrome developed permanent ET pathology. ETD may occur as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy, even in patients without pre-existing otologic disease. Level 4-Case series & retrospective cohort studies.
Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Complications
- Eustachian Tube
- Osteotomy, Le Fort
- Ear Diseases