Ten years of exome sequencing and reanalysis among racial, ethnic, and ancestral groups: The importance of equitable reanalysis access.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41099690.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101576.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Race, ethnicity, and ancestry (REA) affect the diagnostic utility of genetic testing. In addition to barriers to accessing genetics services, some non-European REA groups experience decreased diagnostic results and increased uncertain results. Exome sequencing (ES) is a unique genetic test because data can be reanalyzed with new information and variants may be reclassified after the original result. We performed a retrospective review of 10,416 clinical ES cases originally analyzed by Ambry Genetics between 2011 and 2021 with reanalysis events through 2023. The relationship between assigned REA group, ES result, reanalysis and reclassification rates, and reanalysis initiators were analyzed with logistic regression. Reanalyses increased the total diagnostic yield from 21.4% to 25.5%. There were no significant differences in reclassification rate among REA groups. However, the African American and Black group (P = 2.8E-07), the Hispanic and Latino group (P = .0022), and the Asian group (P = .033) were significantly less likely to receive provider-initiated reanalysis compared with the White group. Although reclassification rates were not found to be associated with REA group, not all REA groups had the same access to ES reanalysis. Laboratory-initiated proactive reanalysis can help reduce disparities in ES diagnostic utility by reducing barriers to accessing reanalysis.
Medical subject headings
- Ethnicity
- Exome Sequencing
- Genetic Testing
- Racial Groups