Global Trends in the Neurosurgical Literature: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis by Country Income Group.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41128544.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1227/neu.0000000000003827.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite growing global interest in neurosurgical equity, research output remains concentrated in high-income countries (HICs), with limited representation from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Although the global neurosurgery movement has highlighted these disparities, its impact on authorship and research equity is unclear. This study uses bibliometric analysis to evaluate 20-year trends in neurosurgical publications, focusing on authorship patterns across World Bank income groups. A bibliometric analysis of publications with topic of "neurosurgery" indexed in the Web of Science database from 2005 to 2024 was conducted. Author affiliations were categorized by World Bank income classifications: HIC, upper-middle-income countries, LMICs, and low-income countries (LICs). Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients were used to assess inequality in research output, and the Mann-Kendall trend test evaluated trends over time. A total of 27 391 neurosurgical publications from 170 countries were analyzed. HICs contributed 80.55% of overall authorship and 77.16% of corresponding authorship. By contrast, LICs contributed just 2.54% of overall authorship and 0.33% of corresponding authorship. Multicountry collaborations accounted for 26.13% of all publications, of which 95.37% included HIC authors, whereas only 9.14% included LIC authors. From 2005 to 2024, the share of corresponding authorship from HICs declined from 86.16% to 58.88%, whereas contributions from upper-middle-income countries, LMICs, and LICs rose significantly (P < .001). Overall, Gini coefficients improved from 0.74 in 2005 to 0.61 in 2023, indicating a modest but statistically significant reduction in research inequality over time (tau = -0.79, P < .001). Despite a 4-fold increase in publication volume and rising international collaboration, neurosurgical research remains heavily dominated by HICs. While authorship equity has modestly improved over the past 2 decades, disparities remain stark, especially for LICs. These findings highlight the need for targeted, sustainable efforts to promote equitable research partnerships, capacity building, and lower-middle-income country leadership in global neurosurgery.