High Correlation but Limited Agreement: Reassessing the Stand-Alone Use of the SANE Score Compared to ASES After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Liévano, Jorge Rojas; Damiani, Corina Salas; Vélez, Jorge; Fierro, Guido; González, Juan Carlos · J Shoulder Elbow Surg · 2025

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes are essential for tracking recovery after rotator cuff repair. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores are widely used, and some studies have proposed SANE as a stand-alone tool based on its strong correlation with multidimensional instruments and its ease of use. However, correlation alone does not establish clinical interchangeability. This study evaluated both correlation and agreement between ASES and SANE scores across key stages of postoperative recovery. We retrospectively analyzed 302 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair between 2019 and 2022 within a standardized clinical care pathway. Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman agreement analyses were performed between ASES and SANE scores at preoperative, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex and limb dominance. Correlation between ASES and SANE scores increased over time, from moderate preoperatively (r = 0.41) to very high at 12 months (r = 0.91). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed wide limits of agreement at all time points, particularly preoperatively (mean difference = -7.5; LoA: -48.6 to 33.6), indicating clinically relevant discrepancies. At 12 months, agreement improved (mean difference = -1.5; LoA: -15.7 to 12.7), but remained outside commonly accepted minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Correlation patterns were consistent across sex and dominance subgroups. Although ASES and SANE scores are highly correlated at one year, they are not clinically interchangeable-particularly during early recovery. While SANE may be acceptable as a stand-alone measure in select settings, our findings suggest it should be used to complement-rather than replace-multidimensional tools like ASES when nuanced functional assessment is required. Basic Science Study; Validation of Outcome Instruments.

Anatomy