MRI-based Habitat Analysis for the Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Primary Spinal Tumors.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41147907.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1148/radiol.242993 and PMC identifier 12767461.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Background Prediction of prognosis in patients with primary spinal tumors is critical for treatment planning but a clinical challenge. Purpose To develop an MRI-based nested habitat radiomics model to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with primary spinal tumors. Materials and Methods This dual-center retrospective study analyzed patients with resected primary spinal tumors. Patients from March 2010 to August 2019 were assigned to a training set; from September 2019 to October 2022, to an internal test set; and from March 2010 to October 2022, to an external test set. Whole-tumor regions of interest were delineated on T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans. Nested habitat radiomic analysis was performed to locate aggressive subregions associated with a poorer prognosis. Initially, a support vector machine model classified tumors based on global features. Then, local radiomics features were extracted to generate probability maps to identify aggressive tumor subregions with use of <i>k</i>-means clustering. Features from tumor microregions with the highest probability were used to build a final habitat model. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Among 259 patients (median age, 39 years [IQR, 28-53 years]; 150 female), the habitat model better predicted PFS compared with the whole-tumor radiomics model (AUC [training set], 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.98] vs 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.93]; <i>P</i> = .03, DeLong test). The habitat model combined with clinical characteristics showed the best performance (AUC [training set], 0.95 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.99]; AUC [internal test set], 0.86 [95% CI: 0.69, 0.96]; AUC [external test set], 0.89 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.96]). The nested habitat radiomics score was an independent risk factor for 3-year PFS (high- vs low-risk group PFS: 24 vs 28 months; log-rank <i>P</i> = .04) in the external test dataset. Conclusion In patients with primary spinal tumors, an MRI-based nested habitat radiomics model outperformed other models in predicting PFS. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Jabehdar Maralani and Burgess in this issue.
Medical subject headings
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Spinal Neoplasms