Technological pathways for cost-effective steel decarbonization.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41162702.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-09658-9 and PMC identifier 12589104.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
The iron and steel sector is central to national net-zero efforts but remains hard to abate<sup>1,2</sup>. Existing decarbonization roadmaps fail to guide technology choices for individual plants, given their heterogeneity and economic constraints<sup>3-5</sup>. Here, by integrating two global plant-level datasets and forecasted technology costs, we develop a model to identify the least-cost technology pathway for each plant worldwide in alignment with national carbon-neutrality targets. In the short term (pre-2030), energy efficiency improvements and scrap reuse are the cheapest decarbonization strategies, reducing cumulative global carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions by 7.8 Gt and 7.2 Gt at average costs of -US$8.5 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>-1</sup> and US$0.3 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>-1</sup>, respectively. In the long term (after 2030), smelt reduction with carbon capture is expected to become technically mature and economically viable, achieving approximately 6.0 Gt of CO<sub>2</sub> reductions at costs of US$7-15 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>-1</sup> in Chinese plants and US$26-75 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>-1</sup> in plants across Japan, Korea and Europe. After 2040, green-hydrogen-based steelmaking is estimated to contribute an additional 0.3 Gt of CO<sub>2</sub> abatement in European plants at costs of US$27-44 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>-1</sup>. This study tailors plant-specific least-cost technology pathways that reconcile stakeholders' economic interests with climate objectives, enabling actionable decarbonization strategies and supporting global net-zero targets.