Redefining Rurality: Adopting an Identity-Based and Community-Engaged Approach to Defining Rural Cancer Disparities.

Kauer, Trevor; Franco, Courtny L; Munroe, Dominique D; Doescher, Mark; Paskett, Electra D; Swenson, Wade T; Tossas, Katherine Y; Cerhan, James R et al. · J Natl Cancer Inst · 2025

expert_opinion · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

Rural health disparities in the United States remain poorly understood, in part due to inconsistent definitions of "rurality" and the failure to integrate both geographic and socially constructed dimensions of place. This commentary draws from insights shared during the panel "Addressing Diversity in Cancer Prevention, Control, and Survivorship Within Rural Communities" at the 2024 Transforming Community and Rural Healthcare (TCRH) conference. Panelists emphasized the limitations of current rural-urban classification systems, which often overlook the intersectional identities, cultural heterogeneity, and lived experiences of rural populations. They advocated for integrating community-based participatory research (CBPR) and identity-based approaches to define rurality more holistically. Such methods prioritize self-identification, social determinants of health (SDOH), and localized knowledge, allowing for a more accurate assessment of cancer disparities and the development of equitable interventions. The commentary outlines how geophysical and census-based metrics, while convenient, can misrepresent rural communities and inadvertently perpetuate disparities in cancer care access, outcomes, and policy. The authors argue for an identity- and community-centered conceptualization of rurality that is dynamic, inclusive, and responsive to the complexity of rural life.