Use of Cementless or Cemented Stems in One-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Hip Arthroplasty Does Not Affect Outcomes: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study From an Institutional Registry with a Mean Follow-Up of Six Years.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41238009.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.014.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most dramatic complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated whether a one-stage arthroplasty using a cemented or uncemented stem was associated with better survival in terms of infection and mechanical complications. Patients were selected from a PJI institutional registry of THA between 2003 and 2019. After matching the two groups by propensity score at a 1:3 ratio, 241 patients were finally included: 62 in the cemented group and 179 in the cementless group. The mean age of the population was 68 years (range, 25.1 to 91.4), and 45.2% (109 of 241) of the patients were women, with a mean body mass index of 26.9 (range, 15.6 to 46.4). The mean follow-up was 6.6 years (range, 0.1 to 18.1). To compare the overall survival rate between groups, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. The overall survival rate in our series was 93.3% [88.2 to 98.7] at 10 years. At the last follow-up, nine THAs had been reinfected: four relapses and five new infections. Regarding the reinfection-free survival rate, there was no significant difference (P = 0.62) between the cemented group (95.8% [90.2 to 100.0]) and the cementless group (94.1% [87.8 to 100.0]) at 10 years. At the last follow-up, 34 (14.1%) THAs had aseptic complications that required 30 revisions. Regarding the aseptic survival rate, there was no significant difference (P = 0.61) between the cemented group (81.8% [71.1 to 94.0]) and the cementless group (83.3% [72.8 to 95.2]) at 10 years. To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare outcomes between cemented and cementless stems in one-stage exchange PJI. There is no difference in reinfections or mechanical complication rates when a cemented or cementless stem is used in a 1-stage revision THA exchange for PJI. Other parameters, in particular the shape of the femur and the patient's co-morbidities, must be taken into account when choosing the type of stem to use.
Anatomy
- hip