Adaptive designs in randomized clinical trials: reanalysis of the HOVON87/NMSG18 multiple myeloma trial.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41245539.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103605 and PMC identifier 12613048.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard to assess clinical efficacy of novel drugs, but improved survival extends follow-up time and challenges their feasibility. Adaptive trial designs, offering earlier outcome assessments, may enhance efficiency and accelerate decision-making. We retrospectively evaluated whether applying adaptive designs to the randomized HOVON87/NMSG18 phase III trial (inclusion between January 2009 and October 2012), which failed to meet its primary endpoint, could have indicated futility earlier. We modelled two adaptive trial designs: (1) group sequential and (2) sample size re-estimation. Each design recommends early trial termination for strong efficacy or futility, or continuation if signals are inconclusive. Interim analyses for the group sequential design were defined at 33% and 67% of events required for the final analysis, using O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, and gamma spending functions to control for false positive or negative results. Sample size re-estimation design was evaluated after 67% of events. <i>Group sequential design</i>: Hazard ratios (HRs) at both interim analyses were within futility/efficacy boundaries with the more conservative O'Brien-Fleming and gamma spending functions, indicating trial continuation as planned. However, the more aggressive Pocock spending function indicated trial termination at the second interim analysis with a HR of 0.88 exceeding the futility boundary of HR > 0.85. <i>Sample size re-estimation design</i>: At 67% of events, the observed HR of 0.86 was in the unfavourable zone, whereas the promising zone required a HR between ≥0.76 and ≤0.83. The observed HR indicated trial continuation without sample size expansion. This reanalysis of a MM trial suggests that adaptive designs indicate earlier futility detection and thereby facilitate decision-making. Early signals could reduce follow-up time or potentially offer sample size expansion if the effect is promising but not yet conclusive. Our findings highlight the value of implementing adaptive designs to enhance the efficiency and ethical conduct of future RCTs. The HOVON87/NMSG18 trial was supported by Dutch Cancer Society grant 2008-4246, the Norwegian Cancer Society and Celgene.