[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Comparison to 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and Contrast-Enhanced CT: Results from a Prospective Observational Study.

Bartel, Timo; Pabst, Kim M; Barg, Christina; Berliner, Christoph A; Hamacher, Rainer; Bauer, Sebastian; Falkenhorst, Johanna; Kessler, Lukas et al. · J Nucl Med · 2026

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Although contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT remain standard imaging modalities, both exhibit limitations in detecting small peritoneal metastases and tumors with low metabolic activity. <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) have shown promising results in various malignancies; however, comparative data on GISTs are limited. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in comparison with 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and ceCT, including evaluation of interreader reproducibility and clinical impact. <b>Methods:</b> This study retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with histopathologically confirmed GISTs undergoing [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT as part of a prospective observational study (NCT04571086). All patients (<i>n</i> = 25) underwent additional clinical 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT; ceCT was performed for 23 of 25 patients. Imaging was assessed per patient and per region (primary tumor, lymph nodes, and visceral and bone metastases), and a composite reference standard that included histopathology, follow-up imaging, and clinical data was applied. Interreader agreement, stratified by experience level, was analyzed using Cohen κ (κ<sub>Cohen</sub>). Referring physicians completed questionnaires before and after imaging to determine clinical impact. <b>Results:</b> In total, 28 validated regions (<i>n</i> = 20 patients) were included in the diagnostic efficacy analysis. Per region, ceCT and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT demonstrated comparable sensitivity (83% vs. 81%), followed by 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (65%). [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT demonstrated the highest region-based positive predictive value (100%). The liver tumor-to-background ratio was significantly higher for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT than for 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (median, 7.6 vs. 5.9; <i>P</i> = 0.034), whereas overall tumor uptake showed no significant difference. Changes in clinical management attributable to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT were observed for 6 of 24 patients (25%), including 1 major change. Interreader agreement for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT varied with reader experience, showing the highest concordance between high- and intermediate-experience readers (κ<sub>Cohen</sub> = 0.87 per patient and 0.47-1.00 across regions), whereas comparisons involving less experienced readers yielded lower agreement (κ<sub>Cohen</sub> = 0.00-0.60). <b>Conclusion:</b> [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity comparable to ceCT and superior to 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for patients with GISTs. High diagnostic performance, especially in hepatic and peritoneal metastases, and relevant clinical impact support a role for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT as complementary imaging modality.

Medical subject headings