Natural language processing techniques to detect delirium in hospitalized patients from clinical notes: a systematic review.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41266514.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41746-025-02051-w and PMC identifier 12635077.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Delirium affects 50% of hospitalized older adults and 80% of ICU patients, yet detection rates are as low as 20-30% with traditional methods. Natural language processing (NLP) offers potential for automated detection from clinical notes. We systematically reviewed NLP techniques, searching eight databases through March 2025. From 912 records, 13 studies met inclusion criteria, analyzing over 450,000 patients. Studies employed rule-based methods (38%), machine learning (31%), deep learning (15%), topic modeling (8%), and semi-supervised learning (8%). Sensitivity ranged from 28.5% to 99.1%, with transformer models achieving the highest performance (AUROC 0.984). However, 61.5% of studies showed high risk of bias due to inadequate validation practices. Only one study conducted external validation, and none evaluated prospective implementation or patient outcomes. Critical reporting gaps included complete absence of fairness considerations, missing data handling procedures, and implementation guidance across all studies. While transformer-based models demonstrated superior performance, significant barriers remain before clinical deployment.