Multidisciplinary, non-pharmacological breathlessness intervention service for patients with moderately severe to severe COPD: a randomised controlled trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41309286.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/thorax-2025-223457.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an often-progressive respiratory disease associated with disabling breathlessness. Breathlessness intervention services (BIS), which coach patients to self-manage breathlessness using non-pharmacological strategies, are effective in a variety of populations, including those with cancer and serious respiratory disease. This study aimed to compare the impact of the Westmead Breathlessness Service in people with moderate to severe COPD. We analysed 113 participants randomised (1:1) with moderate/severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>)/forced vital capacity <0.70 and FEV<sub>1</sub> ≤60% predicted) and disabling breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Breathlessness Score ≥2) to either an 8-week intervention involving breathing techniques, handheld fan use, exercise, energy conservation, dietetic advice (n=54) or 8-week wait-list control group (n=59). The primary outcome was change in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) Mastery of breathlessness subscale. Secondary outcomes included change in other CRQ subscales (Fatigue, Emotion and Dyspnoea), exertional breathlessness intensity/unpleasantness (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score), anxiety and depression. Difference in change over 8 weeks between groups was compared using ANCOVA; p<0.05 statistically significant. Participants were aged 70.9 (±8.5) years, 50% female, mean FEV<sub>1</sub> =0.8 L (±0.3 L; 34% predicted), mMRC Breathlessness Score 3 (IQR 3-4). CRQ-Mastery improved following intervention compared with control (between-group difference 0.5 units; 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8; p=0.0262) using modified intention-to-treat analysis. Better CRQ-Dyspnoea and CRQ-Fatigue were seen in the intervention group (between-group difference-CRQ-Dyspnoea 0.4 units; CI 0.1 to 0.7; p=0.005, and CRQ-Fatigue 0.4 units; CI 0.1 to 0.7; p=0.014). Exertional breathlessness intensity (difference -0.8 units; CI -1.4 to -0.2; p=0.013) and breathlessness unpleasantness (difference -1.2 units; CI -1.7 to -0.6; p=0.001) also improved. An 8-week BIS improved CRQ-Mastery, Dyspnoea and Fatigue, exertional breathlessness intensity and unpleasantness in people with severe COPD.
Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Dyspnea