Quality of life and late toxicity after total neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer - LARCT-US.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41319717.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111318.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is increasingly used to treat locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) due to more complete responses and fewer systemic recurrences. However, its impact on quality-of-life (QoL) or late toxicity remains under-investigated. This study evaluates this in a large real-world Swedish cohort treated with an abbreviated RAPIDO-TNT-protocol (LARCT-US). In the prospective LARCT-US study, 273 LARC patients from 16 Swedish hospitals received short-course radiotherapy (5x5 Gy) followed by four cycles of CAPOX (or six cycles of mFOLFOX-6). An additional 189 patients who received similar treatment were included (ad modum LARCT-US, AdmL). QoL was assessed three years post-treatment using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 and bowel function using the LARS-score. Physician-reported grade 3+ late toxicity was recorded at three- and five-years follow-up. Of curatively treated recurrence-free LARCT-US patients, 144/176 (82%) were included in the QoL assessment. Global health score (GHS) and all functioning scores were high (mean 73 and ∼86, respectively). Flatulence, urinary frequency, and fatigue were the most commonly reported symptoms. LARS was present in 79% of patients (n = 42/53), with 47% experiencing major LARS. Grade 3+ late toxicity occurred in 12% (n = 33/265) of LARCT-US/AdmL patients after three years and in 8% (n = 16/254) after five years. Patients with late toxicity reported worse scores for GHS, fatigue, dysuria, financial difficulties, and role and social functioning. An abbreviated TNT schedule, compared with the RAPIDO-study, used in LARCT-US, achieves favourable oncological outcomes with low risk of late toxicity, and an acceptable QoL similar to other less effective neoadjuvant treatments.
Medical subject headings
- Quality of Life
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Neoadjuvant Therapy