Use of patient-reported outcome measures in everyday clinical practice in ophthalmology: results of a European multicountry survey.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41320232.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bjo-2025-328798 and PMC identifier 13151494.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reflect patients' abilities, difficulties and perceptions, but their use in ophthalmic care in Europe is unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey among ophthalmologists in the UK, Germany and Switzerland to assess PROM use in routine care, their perceived value and implementation barriers. Only 31% of 112 respondents reported using PROMs, mostly in cataract care, with no differences across countries or clinical settings. Strikingly, perceived usefulness did not predict adoption. Reported barriers included staff and patient burden and uncertainty about instrument choice. To promote routine use of PROMs in ophthalmology, system-level integration and support are needed.
Medical subject headings
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Ophthalmology
- Ophthalmologists
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'