Comparative effectiveness of adjuvant treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with high risk of recurrence: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41343439.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0335457 and PMC identifier 12677550.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To identify the most effective postoperative intervention regimen for persons with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at high risk of recurrence. A network meta-analysis was conducted by collecting eligible studies from Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were applied to pooled data on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). 35 studies involving 6,372 patients were analyzed. Pairwise meta-analysis showed higher OS (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.56-0.72; P < 0.001; I2 = 70.9%, random effects model) and RFS (HR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.56-0.70; P < 0.001; I2 = 60.2%, random effects model) in the adjuvant intervention group compared to surgery alone. ICIs&TKIs (SUCRA = 87.3%) was significantly more effective for OS, and TKIs&TACE (SUCRA = 84.1%) was significantly more effective for RFS. Reasonable postoperative intervention regimens can reduce recurrence risk and improve prognosis. ICIs&TKIs and TKIs&TACE are likely the two most effective adjuvant intervention regimens for individuals with HCC who are at high risk of recurrence.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Liver Neoplasms
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local