Persuading voters using human-artificial intelligence dialogues.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41345316.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-09771-9.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There is great public concern about the potential use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) for political persuasion and the resulting impacts on elections and democracy<sup>1-6</sup>. We inform these concerns using pre-registered experiments to assess the ability of large language models to influence voter attitudes. In the context of the 2024 US presidential election, the 2025 Canadian federal election and the 2025 Polish presidential election, we assigned participants randomly to have a conversation with an AI model that advocated for one of the top two candidates. We observed significant treatment effects on candidate preference that are larger than typically observed from traditional video advertisements<sup>7-9</sup>. We also document large persuasion effects on Massachusetts residents' support for a ballot measure legalizing psychedelics. Examining the persuasion strategies<sup>9</sup> used by the models indicates that they persuade with relevant facts and evidence, rather than using sophisticated psychological persuasion techniques. Not all facts and evidence presented, however, were accurate; across all three countries, the AI models advocating for candidates on the political right made more inaccurate claims. Together, these findings highlight the potential for AI to influence voters and the important role it might play in future elections.
Medical subject headings
- Artificial Intelligence
- Politics
- Persuasive Communication