Epcoritamab, lenalidomide, and rituximab versus lenalidomide and rituximab for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE FL-1): a global, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Falchi, Lorenzo; Nijland, Marcel; Huang, Huiqiang; Linton, Kim M; Seymour, John F; Tao, Rong; Kwiatek, Michal; Costa, Abel et al. · Lancet · 2026

rct · Level I

Where this comes from

Abstract

An unmet need persists for chemotherapy-free regimens that induce durable responses for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Lenalidomide and rituximab (R<sup>2</sup>) is an accepted standard of care in this population. The EPCORE FL-1 trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> versus R<sup>2</sup> in participants with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma after at least one previous line of chemoimmunotherapy. In this multicountry, open-label, phase 3 trial, participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to fixed-duration epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> or R<sup>2</sup> for up to 12 cycles. Epcoritamab was administered weekly in cycles 1-3 and every 4 weeks in cycles 4-12, lenalidomide once daily during cycles 1-12 (days 1-21), and rituximab weekly during cycle 1 and monthly in cycles 2-5. The dual primary endpoints were overall response rate and progression-free survival by independent review committee. The data reported here are from a planned interim analysis carried out after 78% of progression-free survival events had occurred. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05409066, and EudraCT, 2021-000169-34, and is ongoing (closed to recruitment). Out of 668 participants screened for eligibility across 189 academic and non-academic centres in 30 countries across Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America, a total of 488 participants were randomly allocated, 243 to epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> and 245 to R<sup>2</sup>. The trial met its dual primary endpoints, showing superiority of epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> over R<sup>2</sup> in overall response rate and progression-free survival. With a median follow-up of 14·8 months (IQR 11·4-19·0), overall response rate was 95% (95% CI 92-97) with epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> versus 79% (74-84; p<0·0001) with R<sup>2</sup>. Progression-free survival was longer with epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> versus R<sup>2</sup> (hazard ratio 0·21 [95% CI 0·14-0·31], p<0·0001); estimated 16-month progression-free survival favoured epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> (85·5% vs 40·2%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more frequent with epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> (219 [90%] of 243 participants) versus R<sup>2</sup> (161 [68%] of 238 participants). Cytokine release syndrome was low grade with epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> (grade 1 in 28 [21%] participants and grade 2 in seven [5%] participants) and manageable, and all events were resolved. Epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> resulted in significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival versus R<sup>2</sup> among participants with follicular lymphoma who had received at least one line of therapy. Epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> had more grade 3 or higher adverse events versus R<sup>2</sup>. Adverse events were manageable and consistent with the established safety profiles of the individual components, with no new safety findings identified. These findings position epcoritamab plus R<sup>2</sup> as a new standard of care for second-line or subsequent treatment of follicular lymphoma. AbbVie and Genmab.

Medical subject headings