Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone Versus Combined With Radiation Therapy as First-Line Therapy for Early-Stage Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41380805.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.11.062.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate survival outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone versus TACE plus radiation therapy (RT) as first-line treatment in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0-A. We retrospectively analyzed 1243 treatment-naïve patients with BCLC stage 0-A single HCC who received TACE alone (n = 986) or TACE plus RT (n = 257) between January 2008 and December 2018. Propensity score matching and subgroup analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the treatment groups, and to identify patient subsets most likely to benefit from combined therapy. The median age was 61 years (IQR, 55-69); 38% of the patients had BCLC stage 0 disease, whereas 62% had stage A disease. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, except for a higher rate of noncomplete response to TACE in the TACE plus RT group. At a median follow-up of 54.7 months, TACE plus RT demonstrated significantly higher 5-year OS (76.4% vs 62.5%; P < .001) and PFS (41.9% vs 22.3%; P < .001) compared with TACE alone. In the propensity score-matched cohort, TACE plus RT maintained superior 5-year OS (76.4% vs 54.0%; P < .001) and PFS (41.9% vs 12.3%; P < .001). These survival benefits were consistent across subgroups, with significant interactions identified for tumor size (> 4 cm), alpha-fetoprotein levels (> 100 ng/mL), and TACE response (noncomplete response). Incorporating these factors, the TACE-RT stratification model categorized patients into distinct groups with differential treatment effects: groups B (1 factor) and C (2-3 factors) derived significant survival benefits from combined therapy, whereas group A (no factors) showed no differences. Early RT integration yielded superior OS and PFS compared with delayed integration. TACE combined with RT as first-line treatment was associated with improved OS and PFS compared with TACE alone in selected patients with BCLC stage 0-A single HCC. Our TACE-RT stratification model may help identify appropriate candidates for combined therapy.