Retrospective cohort study of launching a new peroral pyloromyotomy practice-A framework for introducing endoscopic surgery within a hospital system.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41387065.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109905 and PMC identifier 12766332.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Endoscopic peroral pyloromyotomy for medically refractory gastroparesis requires advanced endoscopic skill. This study describes a learning framework using combined in-person and video-based proctoring. Retrospective data were collected for consecutive patients who underwent peroral pyloromyotomy by a single surgeon trained through a structured program: 4 case observations, 4 animal models, 9 in-person proctoring, and 8 video-based proctoring. Patient demographics, Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score, gastric emptying scintigraphy, and procedural details were collected. Data were analyzed using a 2-tailed, unpaired t test with unequal variance to compare the safety and effectiveness of video-based to the traditional, in-person proctoring. Short-term clinical outcomes, Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index, and gastric emptying scintigraphy were measured. Peroral pyloromyotomy was performed on 17 patients (12 female; mean age, 53.8 years). Etiologies included diabetic (n = 6, 35.3%), idiopathic (n = 9, 52.9%), and postsurgical (n = 2, 11.8%). The median procedure time was 42.7 minutes (mean, 45.3 minutes; range, 29-65 minutes). Throughout both proctoring methods, the surgeon demonstrated safe, effective performance without complications or reintervention. There were no significant differences between in-person proctoring and video-based proctoring in total operative duration (P > .227). Patients exhibited expected clinical improvements with a Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score reduction of 2.38 units (70.6% reduction, P < .001). Through the integration of a novel learning framework, this study showed minimal time and outcome differences between in-person and video-based proctoring. Steps requiring cognitive training unique to endoscopic surgery (mucosotomy and tunneling) and standard myotomy had no statistical difference. This study supports an integrated in-person and video-proctoring framework as a safe and effective method to introduce advanced endoscopic surgery.
Medical subject headings
- Pyloromyotomy
- Gastroparesis
- Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery