Support vector machine classification of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET scans across subtypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41423553.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-025-07696-z.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
While <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET imaging has demonstrated diagnostic value in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (PwALS) and group-level differences were identified between different disease subtypes (e.g., genetic and clinical variants), refining and validating a machine-learning-based subject-level diagnostic algorithm may improve the general applicability and reliability of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET as a diagnostic tool in ALS. In this study, we employed support vector machines (SVM) to further explore the diagnostic potential of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in ALS, alongside its ability to classify between different genetic subtypes or clinical phenotypes. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET data of 36 healthy volunteers (HV), 25 people with ALS-mimicking diseases (Mimics), and 167 PwALS, grouped by genetic status (e.g., sporadic (sALS) or carrying a C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion (ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup>) and onset (bulbar or spinal) type, acquired with Biograph 'TruePoint' PET/CT scanner, were included in the study (Dataset 1). A second dataset of 183 PwALS and 31 Mimics acquired with Biograph 'HiRez' scanner was included as an independent cross-validation set (Dataset 2). PET images were spatially normalised to MNI space to fit linear SVMs with cross-validation. Only age-matched groups were considered to eliminate age-related effects. For Dataset 1, the linear SVM resulted in an average accuracy of 0.86 for the classification of ALS vs. HV, 0.53 for ALS vs. Mimics, 0.83 for ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup> vs. sALS, and 0.58 for bulbar vs. spinal onset. These findings were corroborated with Dataset2, with an accuracy of up to 0.76 for ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup> vs. sALS, and 0.59 for bulbar vs. spinal. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG brain PET imaging, combined with SVM and age-matching, can distinguish between ALS<sup>C9orf72RE</sup> and sALS with good accuracy, but lacks sufficient discriminative power to differentiate between ALS and Mimics and between different sites of onset.
Medical subject headings
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Support Vector Machine
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Positron-Emission Tomography