Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Perioperative Complications Following Cervical Spine Surgery.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41441869.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/21925682251412810 and PMC identifier 12738276.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Study DesignProspective multicenter cohort study.ObjectivesTo determine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative complications following cervical spine surgery and to explore their association with long-term clinical outcomes.MethodsA total of 1482 patients with degenerative cervical disorders who underwent surgery at 10 high-volume institutions in Japan were prospectively enrolled. Perioperative complications were defined as events occurring within 30 days postoperatively. Risk factors were analyzed using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 at baseline and 2 years postoperatively.ResultsPerioperative complications occurred in 5.5% of patients: segmental motor paralysis (2.3%), neurological deficit (0.6%), dural tear (0.5%), CSF leakage (0.3%), epidural hematoma (0.9%), and surgical site infection (0.8%). Male sex (OR 3.049; 95% CI 1.045-8.929) and posterior fusion (OR 4.016; 95% CI, 1.518-10.620) were significant risk factors for segmental motor paralysis, while respiratory disease (OR 5.500; 95% CI, 1.462-20.694) was associated with surgical site infection. At 2 years, patients with complications showed variable neurological recovery, with many failing to reach the minimum clinically important difference.ConclusionsMale sex, posterior fusion, and respiratory disease were identified as significant risk factors for major complications. Awareness of these factors may support improved surgical planning and perioperative management. However, interpretation of long-term outcomes should be made with caution because of the limited number of cases and potential selection bias associated with incomplete follow-up.
Anatomy
- cervical spine