The implementation gap in anterior cruciate ligament prevention programs-From evidence to everyday practice.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41474180.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/ksa.70258.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury remains one of the most impactful injuries in pivoting sports, with non-contact mechanisms accounting for the majority of cases and offering a clear target for prevention. Robust evidence-including multiple Level 1 meta-analyses-demonstrates that structured neuromuscular training (NMT) programs can reduce ACL injury rates by approximately 50%, particularly among youth and female athletes. Effective programs are multicomponent, integrate strength, plyometrics, agility, balance and movement-quality feedback, and require adequate training dose and in-season continuity. Despite this well-established evidence base, real-world implementation remains limited. Coaches and sports organisations frequently report barriers such as time constraints, competing performance priorities and low confidence in delivering prevention exercises. This disconnect reflects a broader implementation gap: while we know what works, we are not consistently doing it. Insights from implementation science, including JBI's phased models, facilitation strategies and context-driven frameworks, provide a roadmap for translating evidence into sustained practice. Reframing prevention as performance-enhancing movement training and embedding programs such as the ESSKA 'Prevention for All' initiative into coaching pathways and club standards are essential system-level strategies. The priority is no longer proving efficacy, but achieving widespread, high-fidelity implementation so that ACL prevention becomes a routine component of athlete preparation.