Ethnic and sex-specific differences in proximal femoral geometry and its implications for prosthetic design in total hip arthroplasty - A systematic analysis.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41492324.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2025.12.005 and PMC identifier 12765259.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Restoration of proximal femoral geometry is critical for total hip arthroplasty (THA) success, yet ethnic and sex-based morphological variations remain inadequately characterised. This systematic review synthesises morphometric evidence across multiple ethnic cohorts to inform implant design and surgical planning. A 3-year systematic review was conducted at Yenepoya Medical College (June 2022-present), searching multiple databases for studies reporting proximal femoral parameters in Chinese, Korean, Japanese, European, and Brazilian populations using radiography and 3D-CT imaging. An in-vivo Indian cohort of 96 hips was included for clinical correlation. Studies lacking ethnic/sex stratification, involving pediatric populations, or with inadequate methodology were excluded. Quality assessment used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (≥6 points retained). Sex-stratified data extraction was performed using fixed/random-effects meta-analyses, with meta-regression evaluating ethnicity and sex as predictors of geometric parameters (α = 0.05). Six studies were analyzed, representing six ethnic populations plus one in-vivo cohort (n = 727 femurs). Korean males showed the largest femoral head diameter (48.50 ± 2.23 mm) compared to Brazilian males (31.1 ± 2.7 mm), a 17.4 mm disparity. Neck-shaft angles varied between 126.35° and 132.1° across populations. Chinese females exhibited the highest anteversion (29.03 ± 2.73°) versus males (11.66 ± 1.55°), representing a 149 % difference. Brazilian populations displayed minimal sexual dimorphism (<2 %). Indian CT measurements revealed systematically lower head diameter values compared to radiography (43.0 ± 2.6 vs 48.4 ± 2.6 mm in males). Substantial ethnic and sex-specific differences in proximal femoral geometry necessitate ethnicity-conscious and sex-specific implant modularity or customization to prevent offset under-restoration, impingement, and accelerated bone resorption, rather than relying on universal implant designs.
Anatomy
- femur
- hip