Parse, Align and Aggregate: Graph-Driven Compositional Reasoning for Video Question Answering.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41525566.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2026.3650864.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Video Question-Answering (VideoQA) enables machines to interpret and respond to complex video content, advancing human-computer interaction. However, existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often provide incomplete or opaque explanations and existing benchmarks mainly focus on the correction of final answers, limiting insight into their reasoning processes and hindering both transparency and verifiability. To address this gap, we propose the Question Parsing, Video Alignment and Answer Aggregation framework (QPVA$^{3}$3), which leverages a compositional graph to drive visual and logical reasoning in VideoQA. Specifically, QPVA$^{3}$3 consists of three core components, the planner, executor, and reasoner to generate the compositional graph and conduct graph-driven reasoning. For the original question, the planner parses it into the compositional graph, capturing the underlying reasoning logic and structuring it into a series of interconnected questions. For each question in compositional graph, the executor aligns the video by selecting relevant video clips and generates answers, ensuring accurate, context-specific responses. For each question with its first-order descents, the reasoner aggregates answers by integrating reasoning logic with visual evidence, resolving conflicts to produce a coherent and accurate response. Moreover, to assess the performance of existing MLLMs in the reasoning processes of VideoQA, we introduce novel compositional consistency metrics and construct a VideoQA benchmark (QPVA$^{3}$3 Bench) with 3,492 question-video tuples, each annotated with detailed compositional graphs and fine-grained answers. We evaluate the QPVA$^{3}$3 framework on QPVA$^{3}$3 Bench and 5 other VideoQA benchmarks. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework improves both consistency and accuracy compared to baselines, leading to a more transparent and verifiable VideoQA system. This approach has the potential to advance the field, as supported by our comprehensive evaluation and benchmarking efforts.