Role of real-world evidence from patient registries for psoriasis in decision-making: a systematic review.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41526088.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003291 and PMC identifier 12815139.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis typically requires the use of multiple systemic therapies over a patient's lifetime. The efficacy and safety of systemic treatments are typically evaluated in clinical trials; however, patient registries are increasingly used to monitor long-term outcomes of systemic therapies for psoriasis in real-world settings. Psoriasis registries also generate important real-world evidence about psoriasis treatment that may facilitate a greater understanding of outcomes outside of a controlled clinical trial setting. This study thus characterises the design and measures used in real-world studies of psoriasis treatment from patient registries and assesses its use in informing clinical guidelines and reimbursement decisions. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify real-world observational studies that used psoriasis registry data. PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language studies published between January 2018 and January 2023. To assess how real-world studies, clinical guidelines, and reimbursement and coverage reports have informed practice, treatment, and reimbursement guidelines, a narrative review of recommendations was conducted. All results were screened by two independent reviewers (LP and TAS) using prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes of interest were extracted into Excel, with all conflicts resolved through discussion/consensus. Tables displayed outcomes and research topics first by year, then by registry. CRD42023402431.
Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
- Registries
- Decision Making