Internal Density Calibration in the Proximal Humerus to Estimate Bone Stiffness for Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41540616.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jor.70143 and PMC identifier 12808855.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
End-stage osteoarthritis (OA) alters bone density in the humeral head, complicating implant fixation during stemless shoulder arthroplasty. Current preoperative assessments fail to consider the mechanical properties of bone directly supporting the humeral component. While in-scan phantom calibration is used to determine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), phantoms are rarely used clinically. An internal density calibration method has been developed, but not yet applied in the proximal humerus. This study examined correlations between phantom and internal density calibration, and between vBMD and estimated stiffness in the proximal humerus. Nonpathologic cadaveric CT images containing a K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> phantom were used to analyze a 10 mm region of interest below the anatomic neck. Phantom calibration was performed. Internal calibration used air (A), adipose (Ad), skeletal muscle (M), and cortical bone (C) in three combinations (AAdCM, ACM, AAdC). Finite element models (FEMs) were generated from each. Strong correlations were observed between phantom- and internally calibrated vBMD (AAdC R² = 0.80; AAdCM R² = 0.88; ACM R² = 0.90), with ACM showing the lowest error (9.98%). Estimated stiffness and vBMD were strongly correlated across calibrations (R² = 0.61-0.66), with ACM showing the lowest error (5.46%). Findings support internal calibration for determining vBMD and FEMs for estimating stiffness in the proximal humerus.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Density
- Humerus
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder
- Shoulder Joint
Anatomy
- humerus
- shoulder