Comparative evaluation of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in breast cancer and initial experience with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 therapy.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41553532.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-026-07766-w.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in this population. Radionuclide-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have emerged as effective and low-risk strategies for management of breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, and to provide a preliminary assessment of the clinical potential of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 radionuclide therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. A total of twenty patients with clinically suspected recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were prospectively enrolled. All participants underwent both [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT imaging within one week. The positivity rate of lesions, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were compared between the two imaging modalities across different involved organs. In addition, four patients received a single cycle of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 radionuclide therapy, and were followed for 4 months to assess therapeutic response and safety. The total number of lesions detected by [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT was significantly higher than that detected by [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (85.4% vs. 70.5%, P < 0.001). This superiority was particularly evident for hepatic metastases (94.7% vs. 68.9%, P < 0.001) and bone metastases (85.8% vs. 66.4%, P < 0.001). In contrast, both modalities demonstrated comparable sensitivity in identifying primary breast tumors (100% vs. 100%), regional lymph node metastases (85.4% vs. 81.4%, P = 0.388), and distant lymph node metastases (84.2% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.159). With respect to semiquantitative parameters, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher uptake in bone metastases than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (SUVmax: 8.7 ± 3.9 vs. 6.7 ± 2.8, P = 0.002; TBR: 5.4 ± 2.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.3, P < 0.001). However, for primary tumors, regional lymph nodes, distant lymph nodes, pulmonary metastases, and hepatic metastases, no statistically significant differences in SUVmax or TBR values were observed between the two tracers (all P > 0.05). [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 demonstrated sustained high tumor uptake up to 168 h post-injection. In the four treated patients, the mean absorbed doses to tumor lesions were 0.21 ± 0.09, 0.27 ± 0.14, 0.14 ± 0.05, and 1.02 ± 0.30 Gy/GBq, respectively. Notably, in one patient, the total absorbed dose for all tumor lesions reached 54.23 Gy/GBq at 168 h. No grade III or IV adverse events were observed, and three of four patients exhibited stable disease (SD) on follow-up. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 appears to be a promising imaging agent for breast cancer, while [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 may represent a potential therapeutic option for patients with advanced disease.
Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Lutetium
- Oligopeptides
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography