Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Arabic Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS-AR).
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41616923.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2026.01.018.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) assesses pain, function, sports activity, and quality of life in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Its use in Arabic-speaking populations is limited by the absence of a validated Arabic version. To translate, culturally adapt, and validate an Arabic version of the FAOS (FAOS-AR). Prospective validation study. The FAOS was translated and culturally adapted into Arabic using cross-cultural methodology, including forward translation, reconciliation, back-translation, review, and pilot testing. Adults aged ≥18 years with foot or ankle pain were recruited from two outpatient clinics and completed the FAOS-AR and the Arabic American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS-AR). A clinically stable subgroup repeated the FAOS-AR after 5-10 days. Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and content, structural, and convergent validity. Score distributions showed acceptable floor and ceiling effects. Internal consistency was excellent for Function/Activities of Daily Living (α=0.97), Sports/Recreation (α=0.90), and Pain (α=0.89); acceptable for Quality of Life (α=0.73); satisfactory for Stiffness (α=0.75); and low for Symptoms (α=0.34). Test-retest reliability was excellent for the total score (ICC=0.978) and all subscales except Symptoms (ICC=0.778). The standard error of measurement was 3.16, yielding a minimal detectable change of 8.76 points. Principal component analysis supported unidimensionality for most subscales, whereas Symptoms demonstrated multidimensionality. Convergent validity was shown by correlations with AOFAS-AR domains (ρ=0.516-0.673). The FAOS-AR is valid for assessing outcomes in patients with foot and ankle conditions. Level II.
Anatomy
- ankle
- foot