Percutaneous Hammertoe Correction Using Extra-Articular Osteotomies: A Retrospective Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41621773.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2026.01.019.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of percutaneous correction of lesser toe deformities using extra-articular osteotomies, with a focus on patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications. A retrospective review was conducted on 98 percutaneous hammertoe correction procedures performed on 41 patients between April 2019 and April 2024. Inclusion criteria included age >18, minimum 12-month clinical follow-up, and pre- and post-operative radiographs. Procedures involving interphalangeal arthrodesis or isolated fifth toe corrections were excluded. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI) pre-operatively and at least one year post-operatively. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests. Complications and concomitant procedures were also recorded. Patients had a significant improvement in overall FFI scores, from a pre-operative average of 86.3 to a post-operative average of 34.9 (p < 0.0001). Subscale improvements were also statistically significant for pain (p < 0.0001) and disability (p < 0.0001), but not for activity limitation (p = 0.06). Common concomitant procedures included percutaneous hallux valgus correction (46%) and distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomies (39%). The most frequent complications were recurrence requiring revision arthrodesis (7%) or capsular release (5%). No infections or wound complications were reported. Percutaneous correction of lesser toe deformities using extra-articular osteotomies offers a safe and effective alternative to traditional open techniques. The procedure significantly improves patient-reported outcomes with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. Further research, including long-term follow-up and comparison with open techniques, is warranted. 3 - Therapeutic Study, Retrospective Comparative study.