EPIRETINAL PROLIFERATION EMBEDDING WITHOUT INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING FOR LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLE.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41666368.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004792 and PMC identifier 13196850.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To report anatomical and functional outcomes of epiretinal proliferation (EP) embedding without internal limiting membrane peeling for lamellar macular holes (LMHs) with EP. This retrospective interventional case series involved patients with idiopathic LMHs and EP who underwent pars plana vitrectomy using the EP-embedding technique without internal limiting membrane peeling. The EP was peeled centripetally, left connected to the LMH edge, and embedded into the retinal cleavage plane. 20% sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade was applied. After surgery, patients were recommended to avoid lying face-up. Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included, and the mean follow-up was 12 ± 8 months. Lamellar macular hole closure was achieved in 100% of cases. Best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness showed significant postoperative improvement, from 0.31 ± 0.20 logMAR (20/40 Snellen) and 156.5 ± 40.7 µ m preoperatively to 0.10 ± 0.12 logMAR (20/25 Snellen) ( P = 0.002) and 221.5 ± 46.5 µ m ( P < 0.001), respectively. Ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane restoration rates were 50% and 100%, respectively. No cases of full-thickness macular hole formation, LMH recurrence, or major complications were observed. EP-embedding without internal limiting membrane peeling yields favorable anatomical and functional outcomes in LMHs with EP and supports the nontractional pathophysiology of the condition.
Medical subject headings
- Retinal Perforations
- Vitrectomy
- Visual Acuity
- Epiretinal Membrane
- Basement Membrane