Cost-Effectiveness of Nirsevimab and Maternal RSVpreF Immunization Strategies in Low-Risk Infants.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41713490.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1542/peds.2025-071558.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In 2023, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended both nirsevimab for infants aged less than 8 months and RSVpreF vaccine for pregnant patients at 32 to 36 weeks' gestation to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infections in infants. We compared the cost-effectiveness of the ACIP-recommended mixed nirsevimab and RSVpreF strategy vs a nirsevimab-only strategy for healthy, low-risk infants in the United States. A decision tree with nested Markov models compared 3 immunization strategies for healthy low-risk infants: no immunization, a mixed strategy of RSVpreF and nirsevimab per ACIP guidelines, and nirsevimab only for all infants. We estimated health and societal outcomes using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs from a health care sector perspective (ie, direct medical costs) and a societal perspective (ie, factors like caregiver productivity loss). We assessed cost-effectiveness using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000/QALY to benchmark cost-effectiveness and conducted sensitivity analyses. From the health care sector perspective, neither the mixed strategy nor the nirsevimab-only strategy was cost-effective compared with no immunization, according to the $150 000/QALY threshold. From the societal perspective, the mixed strategy was cost-effective compared with no immunization ($117 848/QALY). Due to higher product costs, nirsevimab alone was not cost-effective compared with the mixed strategy ($347 821/QALY). However, if RSVpreF was not an option, the nirsevimab-only strategy would be cost-effective compared with no immunization ($134 391/QALY). Results were sensitive to assumptions about product costs and efficacy. Pediatricians and obstetricians should jointly recommend RSV immunizations, as the ACIP-recommended mixed RSVpreF and nirsevimab strategy is a societally cost-effective method to protect infants.
Medical subject headings
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines
- Antiviral Agents
- Palivizumab