Ultrasound-Guided Tibial Nerve Block vs. Local Corticosteroid Injection in Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis Treatment: A single blind randomized controlled study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41713549.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2026.02.008.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Recalcitrant plantar fasciitis persisting after conservative care and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) remains a therapeutic challenge. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and procedural tolerability of tibial nerve block (TNB) compared to local corticosteroid injection (CSI). This is a prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial. In this study 69 adults with ESWT-refractory plantar fasciitis were randomized (1:1:1) to conservative care (control), ultrasound-guided CSI (intrafascially) or ultrasound-guided TNB (perineurally). Pain (VAS), plantar fascia thickness (PFT), Heel Tenderness Index (HTI) were assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months; and SF-12 and IPAQ-SF at baseline and 3 months. Injection-related pain (VAS-injection) was recorded during procedures. No significant VAS change occurred in controls. Both CSI and TNB produced significant VAS and HTI improvements at all follow-ups versus baseline (p < 0.001), attenuating by 3 months. Between-group differences in pain reduction were not significant. PFT decreased only after CSI at 1 week (p = 0.002) and 1 month (p = 0.015), with loss of effect at 3 months. Injection pain was significantly lower with TNB than CSI (p < 0.001). SF-12 improved at 3 months; IPAQ-SF did not. Ultrasound-guided TNB provides clinically meaningful short-term analgesia comparable to CSI while avoiding intrafascial injection and reducing procedural pain; importantly, it may also serve as a valuable treatment option for patients in whom corticosteroid use is contraindicated.