Disentangling Consistent and Specific Information for Double Incomplete Multi-View Multi-Label Classification.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41729668.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2026.3665097.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
As a prominent research topic, multi-view multi-label classification (MvMlC) aims to assign multiple labels to samples by integrating information from various perspectives. However, in real-world scenarios, MvMlC frequently faces the learning challenge of data with missing views and labels, typically resulting from sensor malfunctions, or the costly and time-consuming process of manual annotation. In addition, learning robust representations that are both consistent across views and specific to individual views remains a challenge. To address these issues, we propose a novel double incomplete multi-view multi-label classification framework based on Disentangling Consistent and Specific Information (DCSI). Specifically, we employ a dual-channel encoder with identical architecture but distinct objectives to extract cross-view consistent information and view-specific unique information from all views, respectively. Meanwhile, a view discriminator is constructed to decouple these two types of information, facilitating the extraction of pure consistent and specific information. Moreover, we meticulously design fusion strategies tailored to each representation type. Regarding consistent representations, we propose a dynamic-confidence-aware fusion mechanism that assesses the reliability of each view's representations in relation to the classification task, enabling the model to prioritize information from trustworthy representations. For specific representations, in light of their complementary rather than redundant property, we suggest treating such representations from each view equally to ensure fairness. Through experimental validation on five datasets, the results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.