External validation and recalibration of cardiovascular risk scores for prediction of 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease: a prospective, observational, population-based cohort analysis of adults in Mexico City.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41732703.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101403 and PMC identifier 12925590.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in Latin America, yet most CVD risk equations were developed in high-income countries with limited validations in these settings. Here, we externally validated CVD risk prediction models for fatal CVD, and recalibrated the Globorisk-fatal model in Mexican population. We analyzed 112,262 adults ≥40 years, 67% (75,320) female and 33% (36,942) males, mean age 54.6 ± 10.7 years without prior CVD from the Mexico City Prospective Study. The primary outcome was 10-year fatal CVD, including myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. CVD risk was estimated using the laboratory- and office-based Framingham, Globorisk, Globorisk-LAC, WHO, and SCORE2 equations. Discrimination was assessed with Harrell's c-statistic and AUROCs, calibration with mean estimates, slopes, and calibration curves, and overall performance with Brier scores. Sex-specific recalibration of the Globorisk-fatal model was performed using observed risks of fatal CVD. During 10 years of follow-up, 2429 fatal CVD events were recorded (1667 MI, 762 stroke). All models showed good discrimination, with c-statistics ranging from 0.761 to 0.805 in males and 0.797-0.831 in females. The Globorisk-fatal model had the highest c-statistic in females (0.831, 95% CI 0.821-0.841), and the laboratory-based WHO-MI model in males (0.805, 95% CI 0.783-0.827). Despite this, all equations consistently overestimated CVD risk, particularly in females. Calibration analyses revealed systematic overprediction at higher risk levels. Recalibration of the Globorisk-fatal model improved agreement between predicted and observed risks. CVD risk models showed good discrimination but consistently overestimated risk in this Mexican cohort. The recalibrated Globorisk-fatal model improves risk estimation of fatal CVD in Mexican adults. This research was supported by Instituto Nacional de Geriatría in Mexico.