Perceptions of assisted reproductive technologies in wildlife conservation: Public expectations and ethical implications across three EU countries.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41758891.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0342094 and PMC identifier 12948088.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This paper examines public perceptions of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in wildlife conservation across three European countries: Czechia, Germany, and Italy. In the context of ongoing biodiversity decline, ART can support conservation efforts by promoting population growth, facilitating genetic exchange, and enhancing genetic diversity through genome resource banks. However, the application of ART in wildlife conservation may challenge conventional views on reproduction and extinction and raise ethical considerations, for example concerning animal welfare. To assess public views and ethical concerns, we conducted a survey in three EU countries involved in the BioRescue project, a conservation initiative employing ART to prevent the extinction of the Northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni). The survey explored respondents' attitudes toward biodiversity loss, awareness of the rhinoceros crisis, support for ART in wildlife conservation, and their primary sources of environmental information. The findings inform recommendations for improving conservation communication and fostering public acceptance of ART in wildlife conservation, while emphasizing the need for rigorous ethical oversight to ensure their responsible application.
Medical subject headings
- Conservation of Natural Resources
- Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
- Animals, Wild
- Public Opinion