Managing postinduction hypotension: the jury is still out.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41763962.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2026.01.035.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The EPITUBE trial compared preventive continuous norepinephrine infusion with reactive ephedrine bolus injections in patients undergoing cardiac surgery during induction of anaesthesia, showing no difference in the incidence of severe postinduction hypotension or postoperative outcomes. However, several design features limited the ability to detect a treatment effect, including rescue ephedrine use in the norepinephrine group, absence of vasopressor use in more than half of control patients, and widespread norepinephrine exposure later in surgery. As a result, the two groups achieved only minimal separation in actual vasopressor exposure. The findings reinforce that preventive norepinephrine infusion is feasible and safe, but further research is needed to determine whether it can improve outcomes in selected surgical populations.
Medical subject headings
- Hypotension
- Vasoconstrictor Agents
- Norepinephrine
- Postoperative Complications
- Cardiac Surgical Procedures