Comparative outcomes of full-, partial- and superficial quadriceps tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A PRISMA systematic review.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41774566.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/ksa.70371.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts are favoured in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for their biomechanical properties, yet outcomes among variants-full-thickness (F-QT), partial-thickness (P-QT) and isolated rectus femoris (RF) grafts-remain unclear. The primary aim was to compare failure rates and knee stability among all-soft tissue QT graft variants. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, four databases were searched from inception through June 2025. Included studies (published 2019-2025) reported outcomes for F-QT, P-QT, or RF grafts. After screening 2214 records, 13 studies (n = 427 patients) with a mean follow-up of 24-48 months (level of evidence I-IV) were included. Risk of bias was assessed via the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tools. F-QT grafts (n = 342) showed low failure (0%-5.1%), excellent stability (KT-1000: 0.6-1.3 mm; 90.7%-100% negative Lachman) and improved patient-reported outcome measures (ΔIKDC: +39.4; ΔLysholm: +33.6) but had significant quadriceps deficits (↓26%-31% isokinetic performance). Complications included haematoma (12%) and arthrofibrosis (6%-12.5%). P-QT grafts (n = 57) had minimal strength deficits and a 2.3% failure rate. RF grafts (n = 28) showed a 7.1% failure rate. No infections or fractures were reported. F-QT autografts provide reliable stability. Evidence suggests P-QT grafts may better preserve quadriceps strength, while RF grafts appear to carry a higher failure risk. Long-term evidence remains limited, necessitating further high-quality comparative studies. Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.