RT-SAM: Visual-Prompt Fusion and Uncertainty Enhancement for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy Target Delineation.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41774629.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1109/JBHI.2026.3669979.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Precise delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) and nodal CTV (CTV$_{{\mathit{nd}}}$) is crucial for effective radiotherapy planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Manual contouring is labor-intensive and subject to substantial inter-observer variability, particularly in regions with complex anatomy and indistinct boundaries. This study presents RT-SAM, a novel framework that adapts the Medical Segment Anything Model 2 (MedSAM-2) for automated CTV (i.e., primary CTV and CTV$_{nd}$) contouring in NPC computed tomography (CT) images. The framework synergistically integrates a generalist foundation model (MedSAM-2) with a domain-specific specialist network (2D U-Net) through three principal contributions: (1) automated generation of multi-modal prompts-comprising mask, bounding box, and point representations-derived from specialist network predictions to guide the generalist model; (2) a Visual-Prompt Fusion Attention (ViPFA) mechanism that optimizes feature-prompt interactions through bidirectional cross-modal attention; and (3) an Uncertainty-Enhanced Prediction Adjustment (UEPA) mechanism that enhances model robustness via confidence-based refinement and selective domain adaptation. Comprehensive evaluation on a multi-center cohort of 256 clinical NPC cases from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and 212 public NPC cases from the SegRap2025 lymph node CTV dataset using 5- fold cross-validation demonstrates that RT-SAM achieves a mean DICE coefficient of 0.796 $\pm$ 0.033 (mean $\pm$ standard deviation), significantly outperforming current state-of-the-art methods. Clinical validation by eight radiation oncologists demonstrates that RT-SAM contours are clinically indistinguishable from expert delineations in blinded Turing assessments, achieve superior quality ratings in 75% of comparisons with mean scores of 2.73 for RT-SAM versus 2.66 for manual expert contours, and attain clinically acceptable ratings in over 97% of cases. These results demonstrate that RT-SAM is a clinically feasible solution for automated CTV contouring, with strong potential to standardize treatment planning and mitigate inter-observer variability in NPC radiotherapy.