Tantalum metal cups and augments versus custom-made 3D-printed trabecular titanium implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B acetabular defects: mid-term results.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41804174.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/11207000261424377.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
56 patients with severe acetabular bone defects with or without pelvic discontinuity were included. In the TCA group 31 patients and 25 in the 3D group with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. The main indication for revision surgery with acetabular bone defect was aseptic loosening in both groups. The mean follow-up was 57.21 ± 28.81 months. Implant survival rates were 90.32% in the TCA group and 100% in the 3D (<i>P</i> = 0.24). Functional outcomes improved in both groups based on the Merle D'Aubigné & Postel score, with greater improvement in the 3D group (9.24 ± 3.23 vs. 6.55 ± 2.59 points, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Pain levels improved equally in both groups. Surgical time was shorter in the 3D group (108 ± 34.5 vs. 129 ± 43.4 minutes, <i>P</i> = 0.047).There were no significant differences in reoperation rate, transfusion need, hospital stay, or mortality. Tantalum metal cups and augments and custom-made 3D-printed trabecular titanium implants demonstrated an excellent survival rate in the management of severe acetabular bone defects. The group of patients operated on with custom 3D-printed implants had better postoperative functional outcomes and a shorter surgical time.
Anatomy
- hip
- pelvis