The Inlet Cross-Sectional Area: The Most Reliable Ultrasound Parameter for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41811834.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002930.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite emerging interest in dynamic parameters like the ratio of median nerve-to-hamate distance (RMHD) for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)-particularly in selected populations such as hemodialysis patients-this study evaluates whether the inlet cross-sectional area (CSA-I) retains diagnostic superiority in a general CTS population. In this case-control study, 88 participants (44 CTS patients, 44 healthy controls) were recruited from a tertiary referral university hospital between November 2024 and March 2025. High-resolution ultrasonography measured median nerve parameters. Diagnostic accuracy (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) of CSA-I vs. Outlet cross-sectional area (CSA-O), anteroposterior diameters (AP-I/O), flattening ratio at the outlet (FR-O), and RMHD during rest/grip. CSA-I demonstrated exceptional diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.93). At a cutoff of >9.5 mm2, CSA-I yielded 86% sensitivity and 84% specificity. CSA-O showed lower accuracy (AUC = 0.88) and novel dynamic parameters such as RMHD performed poorly in this general population (AUC ≈ 0.50). CSA-I remains the most reliable sonographic parameter for diagnosing CTS in the general population. A CSA-I value >9.5 mm2 is recommended for routine clinical practice. Dynamic measures may retain value in specific subgroups but do not replace CSA-I for general CTS evaluation.