Combined Real-time Liquid Biopsy With TNM Stage to Guide Induction Chemotherapy Cycles in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Development and Validation Study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41831793.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.03.008.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The optimal number of induction chemotherapy (IC) cycles for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is uncertain. This retrospective study proposes and validates a strategy combining clinical staging with post-cycle-2 plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA status to guide IC cycle selection. Patients with LA-NPC from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (center 1) formed the training cohort, and those from Fujian Cancer Hospital (center 2) comprised the external validation cohort. All received 2 to 3 IC cycles plus (chemo)radiation therapy, with plasma EBV-DNA measured after cycle-2 (post-IC2-EBV-DNA). Failure-free survival (FFS) was compared between 2- versus 3-cycle IC and stratified by recursive partitioning analysis. The training and validation cohorts comprised 794 and 448 patients, evenly divided between 3- and 2-cycle IC. In the training cohort, recursive partitioning analysis stratified patients into 3 distinct prognostic groups. Among the low-risk group (undetectable post-IC2-EBV-DNA), FFS was comparable between the 3- and 2-cycle IC (83.8% vs 87.3%, P = .647). In the detectable cohort, patients with stage IVA disease (high-risk group) who received 3-cycle IC had improved 5-year FFS versus 2-cycle (74.0% vs 56.8%; P = .013), whereas no difference was observed in stage III (intermediate-risk group) (75.9% vs 83.1%; P = .269). Findings were confirmed in the external validation cohort. This retrospective study indicates that patients with stage IVA LA-NPC with detectable EBV-DNA after 2 IC cycles benefit from a third cycle, whereas no clear benefit of a third cycle is observed in patients with stage III or in those with undetectable post-IC2-EBV-DNA.