A multicenter multifunctional assessment of large language models in pure-tone audiogram interpretation for patients.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41832240.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41746-026-02537-1.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
No LLMs (Large Language Models) have yet been evaluated for understanding picture reports. Pure-tone audiograms, the gold standard for hearing loss assessment, are technical and often incomprehensible to patients without specialist interpretation. We conducted a blinded, multicenter evaluation of eight LLMs across diagnostic, interpretive, and recommendation tasks using 140 audiogram reports, assessed by clinicians and lay reviewers. The study revealed that DeepSeek-V3 achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (severity: 67.00% ; type: 54.00%), R1 proved most suitable for general readership (FKGL: 6.41). The general public perceived significant benefits from all models in comprehension and emotional support, with Gemini 2.0 Flash/Thinking scoring higher. Challenges remain in understanding pathological mechanisms and controlling hallucinations. While current general-purpose LLMs cannot replace the diagnostic capabilities of physicians, they may serve as effective auxiliary tools for translating specialized audiogram data into structured, patient-accessible interpretations, with particular relevance for populations facing limited access to hearing-care services.