Re-examining quantum walk advantages: A mean hitting time perspective.

Abstract

Mean squared displacement has been widely used as the primary metric for comparing quantum and classical random walks, with quantum walks showing quadratic scaling versus linear scaling for classical walks. However, this comparison may not capture the full picture: while the mean squared displacement is well suited for Gaussian distributions, quantum walk distributions exhibit distinctly non-Gaussian features. We propose that the mean hitting time offers a complementary perspective with clear operational meaning for search algorithms. Through analytical calculations, we show that quantum and classical walks yield identical MHT for symmetric initial conditions with two detectors, suggesting that the apparent quantum advantage seen in MSD comparisons may be context dependent. Interestingly, introducing stochastic resetting reveals more dynamics. We demonstrate analytically that quantum walks can achieve reduced MHT under stochastic reset through quasimomentum redistribution, while classical walks see no benefit. This quantum advantage naturally degrades with noise, and the quantum walk converges to classical behavior. We suggest that MHT reduction under stochastic reset can serve as an additional signature of quantum behavior, particularly useful for characterizing quantum walk implementations on noisy quantum devices. Our results indicate that different metrics can reveal different aspects of quantum-classical comparisons in walk-based algorithms.