The pan-tumor landscape of gene amplifications and copy number amplification ratio for established and emerging clinical targets.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41870274.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-4018.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Gene copy number (CN) amplifications and protein overexpression are common drug targets and detection relies on various methodologies, including NGS-based CN, IHC, and ISH. We investigated the pan-tumor landscape of amplifications and developed AmpRatio, a novel method of CN quantitation. Pan-tumor tissue (N=486,340) and liquid (N=85,635) samples underwent hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling. A genome-wide CN model for each sample was generated to estimate the purity, ploidy, and segment-level CN. AmpRatio was calculated by dividing gene CN/sample ploidy. A US-based de-identified clinico-genomic database was utilized to assess the relationship between ERBB2 AmpRatio and HER2 IHC/FISH and outcomes on anti-HER2 therapies. Amplifications with varying degrees of gain were reported in 38.6% of pan-tumor tissue samples, most frequently MYC (5.6%), 11q13 (5.2%), ERBB2 (5.2%), and CCNE1 (3.2%). ERBB2 AmpRatio was associated with HER2 positivity by IHC/FISH in gastroesophageal (overall percent agreement [OPA] 90%) and breast (OPA 95%) cancers. Among patients treated with anti-HER2 therapies, ERBB2 AmpRatio significantly stratified outcomes within the ERBB2-amplified and IHC-defined HER2+ and HER2-low/ultralow populations. High concordance (sensitivity 88%) of amplification detection in liquid biopsy vs tissue was associated with higher AmpRatio and ctDNA tumor fraction ≥20%. CN amplifications are prevalent and diverse biomarkers and AmpRatio is variable across genes and tumor types. ERBB2 AmpRatio is associated with outcomes to HER2-directed therapies and may have utility alongside IHC for clinical decision making. With the increasing number of therapies targeting amplifications/overexpression, it will be important to define harmonized methods for CN quantification for optimal patient selection.