Negligible impact of perifissural nodules in an AI-first reader workflow from UK lung screening trial.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41872344.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-026-12444-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of perifissural nodules (PFNs) on radiologist workload within an AI-first reader workflow for lung cancer screening, given that AI cannot morphologically classify benign PFNs measuring ≥ 100 mm<sup>3</sup>. One thousand two hundred fifty baseline low-dose CT scans from the UK Lung Screening (UKLS) Trial were analyzed. A commercially available AI software automatically identified all nodules with solid components ≥ 100 mm³ per the NELSON 2.0-European Position Statement (EUPS) guideline. Three readers independently performed PFN classification, with a senior radiologist with over 20 years of experience performing an arbitration read for the final reference classification (typical PFN, atypical PFN, or non-PFN). Histological outcomes for all fissure-attached nodules were reviewed to confirm benignity. The proportion of participants where a benign typical PFN was the sole finding of nodule presence ≥ 100 mm³ was calculated, representing the extra workload for radiologists to review. A total of 1252 participants (mean age, 68.5 ± 4.0 years; 928 men [74%]) were analyzed. AI detected 838 nodules with solid components ≥ 100 mm³ in 431 (34%) participants. 57 nodules in 49 (3.9%) participants were classified as typical PFNs by the reference standard. Only 24 of 1252 participants (1.9%) had a typical PFN ≥ 100 mm³ as the sole finding that added extra workload. No typical PFNs (0/57) were malignant. The impact of typical PFNs on the maximum achievable radiologist workload reduction in an AI-first reader workflow is negligible, with only 1.9% of participants requiring additional radiologist review triggered solely by these benign nodules. Question In an AI-first lung cancer screening workflow, do typical PFNs ≥ 100 mm<sup>3</sup> create a significant bottleneck for radiologist workload? Findings In the UKLS trial, typical PFNs ≥ 100 mm³ were rare, creating negligible extra workload (1.9% of participants), and none were malignant (0/57). Clinical relevance The concern that PFN morphology creates a bottleneck in AI-first screening workflows is unfounded. Our findings support the feasibility of volume-based AI triage, allowing radiologists to focus on other false positives without being overwhelmed by PFNs.