Frequency and Severity of Allergic Reactions to Non-Mandatory Labelled Allergenic Foods-Data From Two Large European Cohorts.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41873124.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/all.70308.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The consumption of plant-based food has lately largely increased, raising concerns about allergic reactions from ingredients which are currently not subject to mandatory labelling. We analysed the frequency and severity of allergic reactions to non-mandatory labelled allergenic foods (pea, lentil, bean, chickpea, fenugreek, pine nut, sunflower-, poppy-, pumpkin seed, buckwheat) from two large European cohorts: The Anaphylaxis Registry (NORA) and EuroPrevall outpatient clinic study. Severity was assessed using the Food Allergy Severity Score (FASS) and compared with reactions to mandatory labelled allergenic foods. Among 589 reactions from both cohorts, sunflower seed was the most frequent trigger (n = 126). In NORA, pine nut (1.0% of food-induced allergic reactions) was most common followed by pea and buckwheat (0.7% each); in EuroPrevall, sunflower seed (1.2%), poppy seed (0.6%) and lentil (0.6%) predominated. After adjusting for age and sex, the severity of reactions to mandatory labelled seeds and legumes (excluding peanut) were not different (nFASS median: 4.39 vs. 4.43 and 4.56 vs. 4.49). Whereas, cereal-induced reactions (6.47) were significantly more severe than buckwheat (4.77). In Nora, the number of reactions to fenugreek and pumpkin seed were 7.4- and 3.7-fold higher in 2015-2022 versus 2007-2014. Non-mandatory labelled allergenic foods were identified to cause severe allergic reactions in two large European cohorts. The frequent involvement of sunflower seed, pine nut, pea and lentil, but also rising numbers of reactions to fenugreek and pumpkin seed, indicates their potential risk. These allergenic foods warrant close monitoring and consideration in future allergen labelling revisions.